build.bvmcontracting.com

Category: Design & Architectural

  • Should You Hire Your Architect or Your Builder First?

    Should You Hire Your Architect or Your Builder First?

    TLDR: This is not an argument against hiring an architect first. It is an argument against having only an architect at the table. When drawings get finished in isolation and then shopped to builders, homeowners usually discover a large gap between the design they fell in love with and what it costs to build. The fix is not a different order of hiring. It is getting the whole project team involved early, and choosing an architect who wants that.

    What Usually Happens

    A homeowner hires an architect, works through a wishlist, arrives at a finished set of drawings, and only then starts talking to builders. It feels like the responsible order. Design first, price second.

    The problem shows up in the first real conversation. Not all architects and architectural partners are built equally. Some care deeply about budget adherence. Others are more focused on getting you to sign the dotted line, and the same is true of builders. When we start working with a client whose architect is new to us, we try to understand every conversation had to date and get that architect into the room with us.

    More often than not, whether the architect meant to or not, a set of questions is still sitting unanswered. How much site work has been done to date? Has shoring been accounted for, or even reviewed? Have the plans been looked at structurally to see whether there are opportunities for savings? What does the mechanical design involve, and what assumptions are being made?

    None of those are unreasonable questions. All of them have to be answered before anyone can put an accurate scope of work together. This moment is also very telling, because it makes clear which clients actually understand their designs and which have been trusting their architect blindly. Sometimes that works out. Most of the time it ends in a massive gap between the dream and the reality of the construction budget.

    What Most Homeowners Get Wrong

    The mistake is not choosing the wrong architect. It is letting the design happen in a silo.Here is the pattern we see repeatedly. The design gets built around a wishlist. The plans are set up to be quoted right before the client is ready to submit for permit. The drawings then get shopped around to builders with varying levels of buy-in, because every builder knows they are one of three. The homeowner is inevitably drawn toward the lowest number, which is really the “let’s take a chance” number, and they pay for it afterward in change orders, poor communication, and unkept promises.

    By the time real pricing arrives, the drawings represent months of work and emotional investment. Changing them is expensive. Building them may not be possible.

    Why a low bid at this stage is the most expensive outcome

    A builder who is one of three bidders on a finished set of drawings has almost no incentive to flag problems. Flagging problems raises their number. The builder who says the least and prices the thinnest wins the job, then recovers the difference once construction is underway and the homeowner has nowhere else to go.

    That is not a builder problem or an architect problem. It is a structural consequence of pricing a design that was never tested against cost while it was being drawn.

    The BVM Approach

    We get a design team involved because we know when to stay in our lane. Rather than pretending we have all of the right answers, we surround our clients with a project team who can take a project from concept through to completion.

    A custom home needs architects, interior designers, structural engineers, mechanical and HVAC designers, and often geotechnical input, all rowing in the right direction. When everyone is at the table from the start and genuinely bought into making the project work, that is when the best outcomes happen.

    Our Cliffcrest Drive custom build in Cliffside is the clearest example we have. That project spent more than two years in pre-construction, working in intensive sprints with the client and their architectural designer: budget build-outs, design reviews, scope adjustments, engineering consultations. Decisions like the OBC Package A2 insulation upgrade and a dual-zone HVAC system were made with full information and real costs attached, not discovered later. The full story is in the Cliffcrest Drive case study.

    How the push and pull actually works

    People assume an architect and a builder in the same room means conflict. In practice, money is the ultimate decision-maker, so most disagreements get resolved by looking at real numbers.

    The architect works to fit in as many of the wishlist items and requirements as possible. The builder is constantly watching the cost implications. Done properly, that is an intricate push and pull that serves the client, because it holds function and form together inside a budget. It only works when there is a common mission, usually the client’s budget or their overarching goals for the project. With genuine common ground, the friction stays productive.

    The Honest Answer on Savings

    We are often asked how much early involvement saves. We cannot give a clean number, and the reason matters.

    We do not know what a client would have spent, because we were iterating on the plans the entire time. The scope never reached the danger area that forces a team to backtrack and hunt for savings, because we knew the budget constraints from day one. The saving does not show up as a line item. It shows up as a redesign that never had to happen.

    What to Ask Before You Commit

    If you have an architect in mind, or a builder, these questions tell you quickly whether the two will work well together:

    • Have they worked together before?

    • What does each of their pre-construction processes look like, and how similar are they?

    • Do they integrate other teams, and are they open to collaboration?

    Understanding each team’s pre-construction process is the part most homeowners skip. At BVM we have an integrated process between design and build that already works well together. When clients come to us with an architect already chosen, we make a point of understanding that architect’s process and confirming it fits with ours.

    An architect who welcomes a builder and other consultants early is the one you want. That openness matters more than the order of hiring.

    If Your Drawings Are Already Finished

    Find a builder. You are already behind, because finished drawings usually mean you are hoping to build soon, and every good builder has a lead time before they can start.

    The most useful thing you can do right now is hold off on submitting those drawings for permit and focus squarely on identifying your builder. Permit submission locks in decisions that may need to change once real pricing arrives.

    Key Takeaways

    • The problem is not hiring an architect first, it is having only an architect at the table

    • Drawings developed in isolation usually surface unanswered questions about site work, shoring, structure, and mechanical design

    • Shopping finished drawings to three builders selects for the thinnest number, not the best outcome

    • A custom home needs architects, interior designers, structural engineers, mechanical designers, and sometimes geotechnical input working together

    • Money resolves most design disagreements, which is why real numbers belong in the room during design

    • Ask whether your architect and builder have worked together, and whether their pre-construction processes fit

    • If your drawings are done, find your builder before you submit for permit

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Q: Should I hire a builder before an architect?
    A: Not necessarily. What matters is that your builder and your wider project team are involved while the design is still moving, rather than after it is finished. An architect who welcomes that collaboration early is the right starting point.

    Q: Will involving a builder during design limit my architect’s creativity?
    A: In our experience it does the opposite. The architect keeps pushing to fit the client’s wishlist and requirements while the builder tracks cost implications, and that push and pull keeps ambitious ideas alive by keeping them affordable.

    Q: I already have permit-ready drawings. What should I do?
    A: Hold the permit submission and find your builder first. Good builders have lead times, and submitting locks in decisions that may need to change once you have real construction pricing.

    Ready to Get Your Team in the Same Room?

    If you are early in design, or holding a finished set of drawings and no builder, that is exactly the conversation to have with us before anything gets submitted. Book a consultation and we will walk through where your project actually stands.

    Related Reading:

  • Aging-in-Place in Toronto: What You Need To Know

    Aging-in-Place in Toronto: What You Need To Know

    TL;DR: Most Toronto families planning aging-in-place modifications discover true costs too late. Cathy Soda spent a year searching for an accessible home when renovation planning with early builder input would have cost less time and money. Pre-construction consultation reveals what your property allows, what your structure requires, and what building codes mandate before you commit to purchases or designs.

    What You Need to Know About Aging-in-Place Costs

    • In-home care costs $19 to $75 per hour in Canada ($150 to $600 daily), but 64% of Canadians over 65 don’t know this

    • Home modifications average $9,500 nationally, with major accessibility projects exceeding $50,000

    • Only 13% of Canadians over 45 have planned for personal support worker costs, despite 90% wanting to age at home

    • Early builder involvement prevents $25,000+ “surprise” costs and code compliance overruns

    The Year-Long Search That Didn’t Need to Happen

    Cathy Soda delayed her retirement after 40 years in banking.

    Not because she wanted to. Because she needed a house big enough for her 92-year-old father, Fred. She spent over a year searching for a property with a main-floor bedroom and the accessibility features he required.

    Her story, featured in The Globe and Mail’s recent series on aging in place, exposes a pattern we see repeatedly in Toronto. Families make reactive housing decisions under pressure. They don’t understand what modifications their current properties allow or what those changes will cost.

    The data confirms this. 90% of Canadians over 45 want to remain in their homes as they age. Only 13% have planned for the personal support worker (PSW) care costs necessary to make this work. Just 6% have both planned for and have the means to afford PSW care if needed.

    This planning gap forces families into crisis mode. In construction, crisis mode costs money.

    What Aging-in-Place Modifications Cost in Toronto

    Here’s what the numbers look like:

    In-home care costs: $19 to $75 per hour in Canada. Over a full day, that’s $150 to $600. Nearly two-thirds of Canadians over 65 don’t know this.

    Home modification costs: National average for aging-in-place remodeling ranges from $3,000 to $15,000. Average projects run around $9,500. Major accessibility projects exceed $50,000.

    Specific modifications we price regularly in Toronto:

    • Fire safety upgrades to homes when additional suites are created for aging parents

    • Structural and plumbing work to augment existing layouts to work for accessibility and space planning

    • For basement apartments, there is prep work needed to ensure that the basement will not leak and be a comfortable space to live.

    • Upgrades to the HVAC system to create separate heating and cooling systems for different suites or areas of the home.

    A lot of the time, the problem isn’t the cost. The problem is discovering these numbers after you’ve committed to a property or a design.

    Key Point: Budget surprises happen when families commit before they know what their property requires or what building codes mandate.

    Why Families Search for a Home for A Year When Modification Takes Months

    Cathy spent over a year searching for a house that met her father’s needs.

    We work with families facing similar situations who take a different path. They evaluate their current property’s modification potential before they start house hunting.

    One client came to us after their second child arrived. They were deciding whether to move or add a basement suite for aging parents. Through our pre-construction consultation, we identified:

    • Their lot could support a basement apartment with Committee of Adjustment approval

    • The existing foundation required waterproofing upgrades

    • Sprinkler system costs would add $40,000+ to the budget

    • Total project cost: $85,000 to $110,000

    They waived the basement suite and chose a main-floor renovation instead. It better served their immediate family growth needs while keeping future flexibility open.

    The difference: they made this decision with full cost transparency before committing to either path.

    Key Point: Property evaluation before house hunting prevents year-long searches and rushed purchases.

    Three Questions That Prevent Age-in-place renovation cost Surprises

    We’ve built a construction database from every project we’ve completed in Toronto since 1997. This database allows us to provide pre-design cost estimates. Most contractors wait until after architectural plans are complete to give you numbers.

    When families contact us about aging-in-place modifications, we start with three questions:

    1. What does your property allow?

    Zoning determines whether you add a basement suite, a laneway suite, or a main-floor addition. Committee of Adjustment applications take time and money. Some properties won’t get approval, regardless of budget.

    We identify these constraints before you pay an architect.

    2. What does your existing structure require?

    Basement accessibility depends on foundation condition, grading, and waterproofing. Poor grading causes water accumulation. Waterproofing systems prevent future problems.

    We’ve seen families budget $60,000 for a basement suite, then learn they need $25,000 in foundation work first. Early builder involvement prevents this.

    3. What does the building code mandate?

    Sprinkler systems. Shoring during excavation. Accessibility standards. These requirements aren’t optional. They’re expensive.

    Design that ignores code requirements guarantees budget overruns.

    Key Point: Property constraints, structural requirements, and code mandates determine true project costs. Knowing these before design saves money.

    What Government Support Programs Are Available for aging in place

    The federal Home Accessibility Tax Credit (HATC) allows eligible households to claim up to $20,000 in qualifying renovation expenses annually. The maximum tax credit is $3,000.

    Toronto’s Renovates program offers:

    • Forgivable loans up to $20,000 for essential repairs

    • Grants up to $5,000 for accessibility improvements (ramps, modified bathrooms)

    Most families learn about these programs after they’ve financed their project. We provide this information during initial consultations. Whether you hire us or not.

    Transparency means you know all your options before you commit.

    Key Point: Federal tax credits and Toronto grants reduce aging-in-place costs, yet most families find out too late to use them.

    Why Aging at Home Is the Preference, Not the Plan

    82% of Canadians would only consider assisted living as a last resort. The preference for aging at home has grown 5% in the last two years.

    Preference without planning creates the scenario Cathy Soda experienced. Reactive searching, delayed retirement, compressed timelines, and limited options.

    We’re seeing more requests for aging-in-place features. 76% of home remodelers reported increased requests from 2020 to 2023. Grab bars in bathrooms are now the most popular feature. 93% of remodelers added them in 2023.

    Clients are becoming more informed about what they need. What’s missing is understanding what their specific property supports and what modifications will cost.

    Key Point: Demand for aging-in-place modifications is growing, yet most families still don’t plan for costs or feasibility before crisis hits.

    How our Pre-Construction Service Protects Your Budget for aging in place projects

    We created a pre-construction service for aging-in-place planning situations.

    Cost: $1,500 to $4,000 + HST, depending on project complexity.

    What you get:

    • Property assessment for modification feasibility

    • Zoning analysis and Committee of Adjustment requirements

    • Structural evaluation (foundation, grading, waterproofing)

    • Code compliance review (sprinklers, accessibility standards)

    • Detailed cost estimate based on our project database

    • Government funding program guidance

    No commitment to build required. You get the information you need to decide whether to modify your current property, buy a different one, or explore other options.

    This service exists because we’ve seen families commit to designs they couldn’t afford or properties that couldn’t support the modifications they needed.

    Key Point: Pre-construction service costs $1,500 to $4,000 + HST and provides feasibility analysis, cost estimates, and funding guidance before you commit.

    What Early Builder Involvement Prevents poorly planned aging in place renovations

    Early builder involvement prevents:

    • Budget overruns: Discovering structural issues mid-project adds $25,000+ in unexpected costs

    • Scope changes: Code requirements that surface late force expensive design revisions

    • Financing uncertainty: Unknown costs create stress and near-cancellations

    • Design revisions: Architectural plans that ignore builder input need costly rework

    • Property purchases: Buying homes that won’t support intended modifications wastes time and money

    Collaborative design between a Builder and architectural design team prevents cost increases. We integrate into the design phase before construction starts, not after. This protects your budget and enables design changes when they’re still inexpensive to make.

    Proper planning in pre-construction saves you money, time, and stress during construction.

    Key Point: Builder involvement during design prevents structural surprises, code violations, and budget overruns that add $25,000+ to project costs.

    What Cathy’s Story Teaches About proper Planning for aging in place

    Cathy Soda’s year-long search could have been shortened if she’d known what modifications were possible on properties she owned or was considering.

    The planning gap that affects 87% of Canadians who want to age in place isn’t about desire. It’s about information.

    You need transparency about true project costs before you commit to properties, designs, or timelines. You need to understand what your specific situation allows, what it requires, and what it costs.

    We built our business on providing this information upfront, whether you hire us or not.

    If you’re planning for aging-in-place modifications, for yourself or family members, start with three questions:

    • What does your property allow?

    • What does your structure require?

    • What does the code mandate?

    Get answers before you commit. The $40,000 surprise you avoid is worth more than the consultation you invest in.

    Frequently Asked Questions about aging in Place in Toronto

    How much does aging-in-place renovation cost in Toronto?

    Home modifications average $9,500 nationally. Major accessibility projects in Toronto exceed $50,000. Committee of Adjustment applications cost between $2,126 to $6,187 plus representation fees. Total costs depend on your home’s current layout, how much of the space you are planning on renovating, where in your home you are renovating, and if there are any structural or plumbing modifications necessary.

    What government funding is available for aging-in-place renovations?

    The federal Home Accessibility Tax Credit (HATC) allows you to claim up to $20,000 in qualifying expenses annually for a maximum tax credit of $3,000. Toronto’s Renovates program offers forgivable loans up to $20,000 for essential repairs and grants up to $5,000 for accessibility improvements like ramps and modified bathrooms.

    Do I need to move to accommodate aging parents or should I renovate?

    Evaluate your current property’s modification potential before house hunting. Property assessment reveals whether your lot supports basement apartments, what your foundation requires, and what building codes mandate. Pre-construction consultation costs $1,500 to $4,000 + HST and provides this analysis before you commit to moving or renovating.

    What building code requirements apply to basement suites for seniors?

    Basement suites typically require fire safety systems, proper foundation waterproofing, adequate grading for drainage, accessibility standards compliance, and Committee of Adjustment approval for zoning variances. Code requirements aren’t negotiable and can add substantial costs to projects.

    How long does aging-in-place renovation take in Toronto?

    Timeline depends on project scope, Committee of Adjustment approval (if needed), and structural work required. Pre-construction consultation takes 2 to 4 weeks. Committee of Adjustment applications add months to timelines. Foundation work, waterproofing, and sprinkler installation extend project duration. Early builder involvement provides accurate timelines based on your specific property.

    When should I involve a General Contractor in aging-in-place planning?

    Involve a General Contractor before you engage a designer. Early builder involvement identifies property constraints, structural requirements, and code mandates before design starts. This prevents budget overruns from mid-project surprises and enables design changes when they’re still inexpensive to make. Better yet, get The Constructible Design Co. involved and you will get design and construction feedback all in one service offering (they also have in-house experience with accessibility design for aging-in-place).

    What’s the difference between pre-construction consultation and full construction services?

    Pre-construction consultation costs $1,500 to $4,000 + HST and includes property assessment, zoning analysis, structural evaluation, code compliance review, detailed cost estimates, and funding guidance. No commitment to build required. You get information to decide whether to modify your property, buy a different one, or explore other options. Full construction services begin after we have gathered all of the necessary information and we mutually decide to enter into a construction agreement.

    Why do families discover $40,000+ cost surprises during aging-in-place projects?

    Families commit to designs or property purchases before understanding structural requirements or code mandates. Common surprises include sprinkler systems ($40,000+), foundation waterproofing ($25,000+), Committee of Adjustment fees, and accessibility standard compliance costs. Early builder involvement prevents these surprises by identifying true costs before you commit.

    Key Takeaways

    • 90% of Canadians over 45 want to age at home, yet only 13% have planned for personal support worker costs ($19 to $75 per hour).

    • Aging-in-place modifications average $9,500 nationally, with major Toronto projects exceeding $50,000 when sprinkler systems, foundation work, and code compliance are included.

    • Pre-construction consultation ($1,500 to $4,000 + HST) reveals what your property allows, what your structure requires, and what building codes mandate before you commit to purchases or designs.

    • Early builder involvement prevents $25,000+ surprise costs from foundation issues, code violations, and structural requirements discovered mid-project.

    • Federal Home Accessibility Tax Credit provides up to $3,000 in tax credits. Toronto’s Renovates program offers forgivable loans up to $20,000 and grants up to $5,000 for accessibility improvements.

    • Property evaluation before house hunting prevents year-long searches and rushed purchases of homes that don’t support needed modifications.

    • Builder and architect collaboration during design protects budgets and enables inexpensive design changes before construction starts.

    Contact BVM Contracting for a no-obligation pre-construction consultation. We’ll assess your property’s modification potential and provide detailed cost estimates based on 27 years of Toronto residential construction data.

    No pressure. No commitment. The information you need to make the right decision for your family.

    About BVM COntracting

    BVM Contracting is a full-service General Contractor or Home Builder located in Toronto. We provide home renovation and building services for major home renovations and custom home builds (full interior renovations, home additions, lot severances, new home construction, garden suites, and laneway suites). Our goal is to help guide our clients through the process of building their home, from concept to completion.

    Further than providing General Contracting and Project Management for major home renovations, we also offer value-added services such as renovation financing, renovation rebate consultations and services, building permit and design services, smart home installation services, and real estate investor services.

    To learn more about our offering by visiting our services page. Learn more about our vision, mission, and values here.

  • Why Most Home Building Projects Fail During Design

    Why Most Home Building Projects Fail During Design

    TL;DR: Nine out of ten permit-ready renovation designs in Toronto never get built because nobody tests them against real construction costs until after plans are complete. By the time builders see finished designs (usually at month 5 or 6 of an 8-month process), projects are often $200,000 over budget. Change orders from poor planning add up to 10-20% of total build costs. The solution is embedding builder expertise during design, not after.

    Core Answer:

    • Design firms get paid whether your house gets built or not, creating zero incentive to say “no” to expensive requests

    • Builders typically see plans when they’re 100% complete, becoming “the bad guy” who delivers budget reality too late

    • Cheap quotes ($700K vs $800K) leave out properly priced subcontractor work, leading to 10-20% cost overruns through change orders and expensive rework

    • Material selections (like tile) made without real pricing create cascading cost and logistical problems during construction

    • Builder involvement from day one reduces change orders to near zero and prevents the $80K+ budget gaps common in Toronto renovations

    Why current residential design Services don’t work

    Nine out of ten permit-ready designs that get costing after plans are finalized never get built.

    Not because they’re technically flawed. Not because the engineer missed something. They fail because nobody tested them against the one constraint: what you’re able to afford.

    This pattern repeats across Toronto’s residential construction market. You invest months and tens of thousands into architectural plans. The drawings get stamped. The engineer approves. Everything looks perfect on paper.

    Then a builder sees the plans for the first time, and usually way too late in the design process.

    The project is $200,000 over budget (this isn’t an exaggeration, we’ve seen this happen). Or the timeline doubles. Or the scope gets stripped back so dramatically the original vision disappears.

    As the person who spent hours/days making your plans perfect, your first reaction is mistrust about what you are hearing. You shop for cheaper quotes. You find contractors willing to promise lower numbers. Then you discover what those lower numbers really cost once construction starts.

    Why Do Design Firms Skip Cost Reality?

    Design firms get paid whether your house gets built or not.

    When you ask for something expensive, the design team has no reason to say no. They add it to the drawings. They move forward. They complete the design process without having the difficult conversation about cost.

    Design teams prioritize avoiding looking bad over protecting your budget.

    Most architects and design teams remain uninformed about construction costs until after the design is completed. They lack the builder network and supply chain access to properly estimate what their designs will cost to build in Toronto.

    When they do provide cost guidance, the number is usually an arbitrary cost per square foot. This doesn’t account for the specific decisions that drive real construction costs: tile selections, structural complexity, mechanical system requirements, and site conditions.

    Design firms operate on possibility versus reality. They sell what could be built. Builders live in what will be built, at what cost, in what timeframe.

    Bottom Line: The incentive misalignment between design firms (paid regardless of buildability) and clients (who need constructible designs) creates the 9-out-of-10 failure rate.

    When Should a Builder See Your Plans?

    In a typical eight-month design process, builders first see plans at month five or six.

    The design is 100% complete. You’re already set on designing things a certain way. The drawings are ready for permit submission.

    The builder becomes the bad guy who delivers the news nobody wants to hear.

    This timing creates a predictable disaster. You’ve invested significant time and money. You’ve made emotional commitments to specific design elements. You’ve told family and friends about your plans.

    Now you’re told the budget doesn’t work.

    Your options at this stage are limited and expensive:

    • Substantially reduce scope

    • Wait and save more money

    • Shop for the cheapest quote and hope for the best

    Most homeowners choose the cheapest quote. Almost all of them regret it (at least the ones that reach back out to us have).

    Reality Check: Once designs reach 100% completion without builder input, backtracking costs time and money while emotional investment makes rational budget decisions nearly impossible.

    What Gets Left Out of Cheap Quotes?

    Building costs aren’t different between builders if everything is priced out properly.

    The key phrase: “if everything is priced out properly.”

    When you see an $800,000 project quoted at $700,000, something is missing. Either the contractor hasn’t priced everything properly, or they’re estimating based on instinct rather than actual subcontractor quotes.

    The question to ask: “Is this pricing based on actual quoted values from subcontractors and vendors with my address on it?”

    Most contractors estimate your project, then figure it out after the fact. This approach transfers risk from the contractor to you. When material costs increase or scope gaps appear, you pay the difference through change orders.

    Based on project data from Toronto builds, change orders add up to 10-20% of total build costs when designs lack builder input.

    On an $800,000 project, the difference is $80,000 or more in avoidable costs.

    The Math: A $100,000 lower quote today typically becomes a $80,000 + overrun tomorrow when change orders from incomplete specifications start appearing. So why deal with the stress of change orders, delays, and rework when you can just account for it from the start?

    How Do Small Design Decisions Create Big Cost Problems?

    Tile seems simple. Flooring is flooring, right?

    Tile is significantly more expensive than hardwood or many other flooring options. The cost varies dramatically based on tile type, size, installation difficulty, and finishing requirements.

    In a traditional architectural process, tile selections happen late in the design process (often after builder input, sometimes not at all). You figure it out during the build.

    This creates a cost risk:

    1. The design shows “tile in kitchen and bathrooms” without specifying type, size, or installation method

    2. The estimate includes a placeholder number

    3. During construction, you select tile costing three times the placeholder amount

    4. Now you have a change order

    5. The timeline extends

    6. Other trades wait

    7. Costs increase beyond the tile itself

    When tile selections happen during design with real pricing, this entire cascade disappears. Though the amount might look larger to start, it avoids the change order bonanza that happens when things aren’t properly planned. If you can avoid change orders, you will avoid a lot of stress, missed deadlines, and potentially costly rework that can all be avoided with proper planning.

    Why This Matters: Tile is one material choice. Multiply this pattern across fixtures, finishes, mechanical systems, and structural elements to understand how placeholder pricing creates the 10-20% cost overrun when there is no proper planning process.

    Why Is This Disparity between design and construction Costing Getting Worse in Toronto?

    Toronto homeowners face a convergence of constraints making design-phase certainty more critical than five years ago.

    Interest rates have reduced borrowing power. Property values have declined in some areas. Financial flexibility has decreased.

    At the same time:

    • Material costs have increased

    • Supply chains remain volatile

    • Municipal requirements have become more complex

    In this environment, discovering budget problems after investing in completed designs is financially devastating. You don’t have the flexibility to waste months and thousands of dollars on designs outside your budget.

    The traditional model (design first, cost later) worked when money was cheap and timelines were flexible. That era is over.

    The Shift: Reduced borrowing power plus increased material costs mean the gap between “design wish list” and “constructible budget” has widened significantly in Toronto’s current market.

    What Happens When a Builder Gets Involved From Day One?

    Early builder involvement prevents the 9-out-of-10 failure pattern.

    When construction expertise integrates into the design phase, cost reality enters the conversation before commitments are made. Design decisions get filtered through actual construction costs, material availability, and supply chain constraints in Toronto.

    The goal: reduce construction change orders to as close to zero as possible. With the complexity of major renovations and home builds, the number will never be zero. But zero is the right target.

    This approach requires a different business model. Design teams need partnerships with builders who provide real-time costing without requiring you to commit to using those builders for construction.

    The value is in the information, not in locking you into contracts.

    When you understand what separates good from great construction planning, you recognize why some approaches cost more upfront but save significantly during construction.

    What You Get: Builder-involved design means every major decision (from tile to structural changes) gets tested against real subcontractor and vendor pricing before drawings are finalized, eliminating the $80K+ surprise at month 6 of your design journey.

    What Are the Hidden Costs of Poor Design?

    The visible cost: 10-20% in change orders.

    The hidden costs are larger:

    • Projects take longer

    • Relationships between homeowners and contractors deteriorate

    • Stress increases

    • Quality suffers when decisions get made under pressure during construction

    Homeowners who choose the cheapest quote after discovering their design is over budget typically experience all of these problems. The contractor who quoted low either didn’t price everything properly or plans to make up the difference through change orders.

    The number of change orders (and the amount of stress) you are subject to through a construction project are inversely proportional to planning quality. More planning and more detailed drawings mean fewer change orders and way less stress.

    The price tag might be higher upfront for comprehensive design services that include builder input. But the construction process becomes less expensive, less stressful, and produces better outcomes.

    Total Cost Comparison: Paying $20,000 more for builder-involved design saves you a lot of stress and costly rework during construction, plus potential relationship damage and timeline delays from construction surprises.

    What Needs to Change in Toronto’s Residential Design Process?

    The industry needs to recognize design completion and buildability are not the same thing.

    A stamped set of drawings passing engineering review can still be unbuildable at your budget. The current system has no mechanism to catch this problem before significant time and money are invested.

    Design teams need access to real construction costing during the design process. Not arbitrary cost per square foot estimates. There needs to be actual construction pricing based on current material costs, subcontractor availability, and site-specific conditions in the Greater Toronto Area and beyond.

    You need to understand that paying for design services that include builder input is an investment in construction efficiency, not an additional expense.

    The alternative (discovering budget problems after design completion) costs far more in wasted design fees, extended timelines, and construction change orders.

    Toronto’s residential construction market is moving toward a model where pre-construction certainty becomes the standard. The companies providing this certainty will become the inevitable choice for clients who value clarity over speed.

    In a market where 64% of homeowners exceed their renovation budgets, being the exception is a structural advantage.

    The Path Forward: Builder-led design models integrate construction expertise from day one, preventing the 9-out-of-10 failure rate by testing every decision against real Toronto construction costs before plans reach 100% completion.

    How The Constructible Design Co. Solves This Problem

    The Constructible Design Co. (launching in 2026) was created specifically to fix the design-construction disconnect. Led by Ryan Meagher, BVM Contracting’s Pre-construction Manager, the company embeds real construction expertise into the design phase from day one.

    Every design decision gets tested against actual subcontractor quotes, current material costs, and Toronto supply chain realities before drawings are finalized. Tile selections happen during design with real pricing. Structural changes get costed through BVM’s project database and actual vendor input. Mechanical system requirements get coordinated with actual HVAC design teams.

    The difference from traditional design firms: The Constructible Design Co. has created a new level of service: Pre-construction Certainty. You get builder-level costing guidance without committing to use any specific builder for construction. The value is in the information, not in locking you into contracts.

    The difference from design-build firms: The costing feedback is unbiased. Design-build firms provide costing guidance filtered through their own processes and methods. The Constructible Design Co. provides costing guidance that works regardless of who builds your project.

    Interior design services are built into the process, allowing early selections of finishes, tile, and fixtures so you get actual supply and install pricing before plans reach permit stage. The goal is reducing construction change orders to as close to zero as possible.

    The Constructible Design Co. only work with clients where their budget matches reality. Every proposal gets tested against real construction costs before you sign a contract, guaranteeing what you want to build is constructible at your budget in the current market.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Why do 9 out of 10 permit-ready designs with no costing feedback never get built?

    Designs fail because nobody tests them against real construction costs until after design completion (or near-completion). By the time builders see the plans (75-90 percent into the design process), projects are often way over budget. Homeowners then face limited options: reduce scope dramatically, wait to save more money, or choose the cheapest quote (which typically leads to regret).

    What gets left out of low construction quotes?

    Cheap quotes ($700K for an $800K project) typically lack properly priced subcontractor work. Most contractors estimate based on instinct rather than actual quoted values from subcontractors and vendors. This transfers risk to you. When material costs increase or scope gaps appear, you pay through change orders that add up to 10-20% of total build costs.

    When should builders get involved in the design process?

    Builders should be involved from day one, not at month 5 or 6 when designs are 100% complete. Early involvement allows design decisions to get filtered through actual construction costs, material availability, and supply chain constraints before commitments are made. This prevents the $80,000+ budget surprises common in Toronto renovations and home builds.

    How do material selections like tile affect project costs?

    Tile costs vary dramatically based on type, size, installation difficulty, and finishing requirements. In traditional processes, tile selections happen late or not at all. Designs show “tile in kitchen and bathrooms” without specifications. Estimates include placeholder numbers. When you select tile costing three times the placeholder during construction, you get change orders, timeline extensions, and compounding costs beyond the tile itself.

    Why don’t design firms provide accurate construction costs?

    Design firms get paid whether your house gets built or not. They lack builder-level networks and the proper supply chains to get accurate construction costs in Toronto and beyond. When they provide cost guidance, the number is usually an arbitrary cost per square foot that doesn’t account for specific decisions driving real costs: tile selections, structural complexity, mechanical systems, and site conditions.

    How much do change orders typically add to construction costs?

    Based on project data from Toronto builds, change orders add up to 10-20% of total build costs when designs lack builder input. On an $800,000 project, this equals $80,000 or more in avoidable costs. The percentage is inversely proportional to planning quality. More detailed drawings and more planning mean fewer change orders.

    Is paying more for builder-involved design worth the upfront cost?

    Yes, at least we think so (but what do we know, we’ve only been through the process hundreds of times). Paying more for comprehensive design services, including builder input, saves a lot of stress, costly rework, and avoids change orders. You also avoid relationship damage between you and contractors, timeline delays, increased stress, and quality problems from decisions made under pressure during construction. The construction process becomes less expensive, less stressful, and produces better outcomes.

    Why is this problem getting worse in Toronto right now?

    Toronto homeowners face reduced borrowing power from higher interest rates, declined property values in some areas, increased material costs, volatile supply chains, and more complex municipal requirements. Financial flexibility has decreased compared to five years ago. You don’t have the flexibility to waste months and thousands of dollars on designs outside your budget. The gap between “design wish list” and “constructible budget” has widened significantly.

    Is The Constructible Design Co. Owned By BVM Contracting?

    No, The Constructible Design Co. is its own legal entity and not owned by BVM Contracting. There is an affiliation with the founder of The Constructible Design Co. working as BVM Contracting’s Pre-construction Manager, but there is no direct link legally to either company. This was done on purpose to allow for unbiased and comprehensive design. The Constructible Design Co. does work with BVM Contracting to craft detailed designs for their projects, but The Constructible Design Co. also works with other talented builders in geographies all over Ontario.

    Key Takeaways

    • Nine out of ten permit-ready renovation designs in Toronto never get built because cost testing happens after design completion instead of during the process

    • Design firms operate on incentive misalignment: they get paid regardless of buildability, creating zero reason to say “no” to expensive requests or provide real construction costing

    • Builders typically enter at month 5 or 6 of an 8-month design process when plans are 100% complete, making budget corrections emotionally and financially devastating

    • Change orders from designs lacking builder input add 10-20% to total build costs ($80,000 on an $800,000 Toronto project) plus hidden costs in timeline delays, relationship damage, and quality problems

    • Material selections (tile, fixtures, finishes, mechanical systems) made without real pricing create cascading cost problems through placeholder estimates that multiply during construction

    • Builder-involved design from day one prevents the 9-out-of-10 failure rate by filtering every decision through actual subcontractor pricing, material availability, and Toronto supply chain constraints before drawings reach completion

    • Toronto’s current market conditions (reduced borrowing power, increased material costs, volatile supply chains) make design-phase certainty more critical than five years ago when money was cheap and timelines were flexible

    About BVM COntracting

    BVM Contracting is a full-service General Contractor or Home Builder located in Toronto. We provide home renovation and building services for major home renovations and custom home builds (full interior renovations, home additions, lot severances, new home construction, garden suites, and laneway suites). Our goal is to help guide our clients through the process of building their home, from concept to completion.

    Further than providing General Contracting and Project Management for major home renovations, we also offer value-added services such as renovation financing, renovation rebate consultations and services, building permit and design services, smart home installation services, and real estate investor services.

    To learn more about our offering by visiting our services page. Learn more about our vision, mission, and values here.